[PD] shell .... again....

[Jack]

Often, on MacOSX, when 'Pd-extended' quit, 'pd' stay. You have to  
force 'pd' to quit then relauch 'Pd-extended' (if i'm right).
++

Jack


Le 8 mars 09 à 21:12, mark edward grimm a écrit :

>
> oh... and PD does not quit. even if i hit "relaunch" or "ignore" or  
> even if i just try to quit in general....
>
> i have to "force quit"
>
> and this has been like this for a little while on differnt  
> systems.. at least at the leopard level. not sure about tiger/ppc/ 
> intel - not sure if that all made a difference....
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 3/8/09, mark edward grimm <mgrimm at syr.edu> wrote:
>
>> From: mark edward grimm <mgrimm at syr.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [PD] shell .... again....
>> To: reduzierer at yahoo.de
>> Cc: "pd_list" <pd-list at iem.at>
>> Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 4:07 PM
>>> what are the symptoms of the crashes? does pd just quit
>>> with a segfault,
>>> or does [shell] makes pd hang?
>>
>> yeah its really weird....
>>
>> i get:
>>
>> "the application pd quit unexpectedly"
>>
>> then i can ignore or relaunch...
>>
>> either choice PD still runs in the background. the
>> "ignore" or "relaunch" seems to be only
>> a nag screen that does not do anything... but at the same
>> time creates the situation that make PD unusable...
>>
>> anyone else with he same?
>>
>> maybe its leopard thing?
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Sun, 3/8/09, Roman Haefeli
>> <reduzierer at yahoo.de> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de>
>>> Subject: Re: [PD] shell .... again....
>>> To: mgrimm at syr.edu
>>> Cc: "pd_list" <pd-list at iem.at>
>>> Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 3:02 PM
>>> On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:53 -0700, mark edward grimm
>> wrote:
>>>> i have been "trying" to use shell...
>> works
>>> OK in linux but in osx it just crashes.
>>>>
>>>> i am just wondering if this thread went anywhere:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-01/067700.html
>>>>
>>>> i have it in a bunch of patches now and would
>> love to
>>> use it more ... if it had more cross-compatibility
>> (osx)
>>> because i tend to work with others + other os's.
>>>>
>>>> maybe i should just change to pdlua as frank
>>> suggested? or might shell someday get fixed?
>>>>
>>>> not sure what to do....
>>>
>>> what are the symptoms of the crashes? does pd just
>> quit
>>> with a segfault,
>>> or does [shell] makes pd hang?
>>>
>>> it's been a while, since i used [shell] the last
>> time,
>>> but i remember,
>>> that i could always make it work with what i wanted,
>> it was
>>> just a
>>> matter of writing the script in a way, so that it
>>> immediately exits or
>>> detaches the running processes to the background.
>> commands,
>>> that do not
>>> exit, will make [shell] block pd. all this only
>> applies, if
>>> you
>>> experience hangs, but not segfaults, of course.
>>>
>>> roman
>>>
>>>
>>> 	
>>> 		
>>>
>> ___________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie
>> zum
>>> neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list