[PD] pdp_rec

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Mar 18 14:23:07 CET 2009


John Harrison wrote:
> If nobody is going to fix the jpeg codec for pdp_rec~, could that codec be
> removed? It gives no errors, appears to work, the frames advance, but the
> recordings don't come out. This email thread shows this has been a known
> problem for some time now and there is no intention to fix it.
> 
> A student and I just lost some time working on her non-trivial patch and the
> problem was that she was using the jpeg codec with pdp_rec~. We didn't have
> a lot of clues to work with to diagnose the problem.
> 
> If we do not wish to remove the codec entirely, perhaps a warning might show
> up on the pd console that the jpeg codec is buggy/not supported.
> 

without having a full understanding of the problem, i somehow doubt that 
the problem is really in pdp/pidip but rather within libquicktime.
putting a warning in the calling application might be even more 
confusing, once the codec get's fixed upstream.
filtering for a certain codec can also be confusing, since the 
codec-names are dynamically extracted from what libquicktime offers, and 
thus can change by simply installing/upgrading a certain plugin.

of course this doesn't help you with your problem.

fga,sdr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090318/b862aacd/attachment.bin>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list