[PD] Multiple sound cards on XP
John Harrison
johnharrisonwsu at gmail.com
Sun Mar 22 14:55:11 CET 2009
Thanks. Tried that (48K sampling) but no dice. However, I did finally get
it to work:
- Installed ASIO4ALL
- Uninstalled the Samson Softpre audio driver (which I wasn't using). I
discovered that this driver was causing Pd to crash when I was choosing ASIO
from Pd.
- From the ASIO dialog box in Pd, chose ASIO4ALL and made the number of
channels equal to the number of sound cards * 2.
-John
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:37 AM, nick burge <tectp at telefonica.net> wrote:
>
> I had exactly the same messages when installing my firewire interface
> (fireface400)and attempting to get the 8 ins and outs that should have been
> available.
> By changing the samplerate from 44.1 to 48khz in audio settings I was able
> to get the thing working....the system clock of the interface has to be in
> agreement with pd I suppose.
> Good luck, Nick
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pd-list-bounces at iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces at iem.at] On Behalf Of
> pd-list-request at iem.at
> Sent: 22 March 2009 12:00
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Subject: Pd-list Digest, Vol 48, Issue 110
>
> Send Pd-list mailing list submissions to
> pd-list at iem.at
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pd-list-request at iem.at
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pd-list-owner at iem.at
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pd-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. multiple sound cards on XP? (John Harrison)
> 2. Re: ADSR variations [was: Re: Patch-off] (Jonathan Wilkes)
> 3. Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea: [send
> (Matt Barber)
> 4. Re: does anyone know of a good Eq I can use? (hard off)
> 5. Re: Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea: [send
> (Jonathan Wilkes)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:03:45 -0500
> From: John Harrison <johnharrisonwsu at gmail.com>
> Subject: [PD] multiple sound cards on XP?
> To: PD List <pd-list at iem.at>
> Message-ID:
> <7aa995dd0903211903k12b5b0cfia00e52da4e5f0e30 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Is there a way to get Pd to use multiple sound cards on XP? I've had no
> problem doing this in Linux, but in XP on both Pd vanilla 0.42-4and
> Pd-extended 0.40.3-extended-20080721, trying to configure MMIO with
> multiple
> cards is giving me:
>
> Terminal Window:
>
> waveInOpen: The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.
> Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.
>
> Pd console:
>
> separate audio device choice not supported\; using sequential devices.
>
> and no input/output on both cards with one configuration.
>
> If I choose ASIO, Pd crashes instantly with this message in the terminal
> window:
> Failed to open () = 0DEV not openDEV not openDeviceIoControl
> STOP_ISO_STREAM
> com
> plete, success = 0
> DEV not openDEV not open
>
> I have ASIO4ALL installed and did seem to have good luck with that in the
> past on another machine...
>
> I'd like to have multiple Griffin iMics plugged into an XP machine and all
> accessible with one instance of Pd.
>
> -John
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090321/3ded9801/
> attachment-0001.htm<http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090321/3ded9801/%0Aattachment-0001.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] ADSR variations [was: Re: Patch-off]
> To: pd-list at iem.at, Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
> Message-ID: <109351.44216.qm at web65601.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 3/22/09, Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
> > Subject: Re: [PD] ADSR variations [was: Re: Patch-off]
> > To: pd-list at iem.at
> > Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 2:37 AM
> > Hallo,
> > Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. I also like the use of list in that patch to
> > store parameters.
> > >
> > > So if you wanted to set parameters with creation
> > arguments, would it just be a matter of using $1...$5 in the
> > [list]s and (un)[pack]?
> >
> > Yes, almost. [list] is a shortcut for [list append] so you
> > need to use:
> > [list append $1 $2 $3 $4 $5] or so.
>
> Actually [list $1 $2 $3 $4 $5] seems to work in this context, but I guess
> that's because the first arg isn't a symbol. Is that why you're saying
> [list append] is needed?
>
> -Jonathan
>
> >
> > Ciao
> > --
> > Frank
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:52:05 -0400
> From: Matt Barber <brbrofsvl at gmail.com>
> Subject: [PD] Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea:
> [send
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Message-ID:
> <c71d8c030903212152v2ce34cb6o41f3eef8205eeab0 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> > Here's my proposal: horizontal connections should only be used when the
> upper object has only one outlet, and the lower object has only one inlet.
> ?Otherwise there will be always be ambiguity.
> >
> > With your example of all outlets pointing to the same inlet, there is
> still ambiguity as to whether or not all the outlets are actually
> connected.
> ?That's fine if your patching style is to connect them first, and only line
> them up after. ?But if someone is debugs a patch they made that includes
> your abstraction, they would have to click and move objects to be certain
> all the objects are actually connected.
>
>
> There is one way to be a little less conservative, but it requires a
> usage agreement: if a horizontal connection travels from left to
> right, it must come from the right-most outlet of the upper object and
> must connect to the left-most inlet of the lower object. Reverse if
> the connection travels from right to left. The problem is there's no
> good way to tell if a patch adheres to the agreement.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:15:24 +0900
> From: hard off <hard.off at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] does anyone know of a good Eq I can use?
> To: patrick <puredata at 11h11.com>
> Cc: pd-list at iem.at
> Message-ID:
> <161320dd0903220015v55dfffbbm8e845c0b3d74bae4 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> there are a few EQ units in my DIY library:
>
>
> http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-1982-diy2-effects-sample-players-synths-so
> und-synthesis<http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-1982-diy2-effects-sample-players-synths-so%0Aund-synthesis>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/bc542942/
> attachment-0001.htm<http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/bc542942/%0Aattachment-0001.htm>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea:
> [send
> To: pd-list at iem.at, Matt Barber <brbrofsvl at gmail.com>
> Message-ID: <659635.57125.qm at web65603.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Matt,
> I like the usage agreement idea, as long as there's visual feedback.
> For example, if the inlets and outlets in pd-ext protruded one or two
> pixels, you'd be able to see the connection crossing over to the "wrong"
> outlet.
>
> -Jonathan
>
> --- On Sun, 3/22/09, Matt Barber <brbrofsvl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Matt Barber <brbrofsvl at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PD] Horizontal Connections (Was: Re: style guide idea: [send
> > To: pd-list at iem.at
> > Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 5:52 AM
> > > Here's my proposal: horizontal connections should
> > only be used when the upper object has only one outlet, and
> > the lower object has only one inlet. ?Otherwise there will
> > be always be ambiguity.
> > >
> > > With your example of all outlets pointing to the same
> > inlet, there is still ambiguity as to whether or not all the
> > outlets are actually connected. ?That's fine if your
> > patching style is to connect them first, and only line them
> > up after. ?But if someone is debugs a patch they made that
> > includes your abstraction, they would have to click and move
> > objects to be certain all the objects are actually
> > connected.
> >
> >
> > There is one way to be a little less conservative, but it
> > requires a
> > usage agreement: if a horizontal connection travels from
> > left to
> > right, it must come from the right-most outlet of the upper
> > object and
> > must connect to the left-most inlet of the lower object.
> > Reverse if
> > the connection travels from right to left. The problem is
> > there's no
> > good way to tell if a patch adheres to the agreement.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: twopix.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 1298 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:
> <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/
> attachment-0002.png<http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/%0Aattachment-0002.png>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: fourpix.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 1334 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:
> <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/
> attachment-0003.png<http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/684da702/%0Aattachment-0003.png>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list mailing list
> Pd-list at iem.at
> to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> End of Pd-list Digest, Vol 48, Issue 110
> ****************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090322/db764d63/attachment.htm>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list