[PD] default [output~] in Pd-extended

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> 
> So if we are introducing the concept of objects and GUI in Pd, then I 
> think it is safe to use GOP objects.  After all, we don't expect newbies 
> to know anything about C or Tcl, but that's under it it all.  I don't 
> think we should add an output~ to help patches that don't already have 
> them.  I just think we should have a more intuitive and usable output~.  
> The current one already uses GOP, so that's not a change.
> 

i fully agree.
and would like to stress, that i am pretty sure that most users will not 
have a clue about gop when they first encounter the [output~] module (be 
it a new one or the original one).

at least i cannot seem to find any documentation about gop prior to 
3/A.05; nevertheless i think it is a good idea to use a gop-abstraction 
here.

fgmasdr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090323/52108ab1/attachment.bin>