[PD] pd-extended font paths

[Phil Stone]

Oh, Gem, of course.  So when I'm not using Gem, I can safely do without 
those eight path elements, then?

Also, while I'm being a whinging pest...it's impossible to add a path 
element that lives inside the pd-extended.app "folder" using the path 
dialog.  This is because OS X makes the .app package not look like a 
folder, I suppose, but it's unfortunate nevertheless.  Off to edit the 
.plist, I go.

Thanks, Hans.


Phil



Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Well, it makes it easier to find fonts.  That's the reason.  I suppose 
> most people aren't using fonts much with Pd.  If [declare -path] works 
> for Gem fonts, then I would consider removing some from the default 
> prefs.
>
> .hc
>
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Phil Stone wrote:
>
>> Do there really need to be eight different font-related entries in 
>> the path list for Pd-extended on OS X?  If so, why?
>>
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
> Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is 
> related to the telescope.      -Edsger Dykstra
>
>
>