[PD] GEM pix_write bugs (timelapse)

[mark edward grimm]

hey thats pretty nice!!

much nicer than my poor gem attempt last month...

> and the patch:
> put this to / because of the bug in pix_write to make it
> work. put a folder called "frames" beside it.

yeah this is weird huh?

  


--- On Sat, 3/28/09, Max <abonnements at revolwear.com> wrote:

> From: Max <abonnements at revolwear.com>
> Subject: [PD] GEM pix_write bugs (timelapse)
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009, 12:52 PM
> hi list,
> 
> i've thrown together this tiny gem patch which makes a
> timelapse slideshow.
> i have encountered a few issues with it.
> 
> configuration:
> Pd version 0.41.4-extended-20090223
> GEM: ver: 0.91.3 'tigital'
> GEM: compiled: Feb 23 2009
> OS X 10.5.6
> 
> the issues:
> 1. pix_write doesn't interpret the file path correctly. it
> seems it can't understand relative paths at all.
> 
> 2. pix_write accepts a message [file <file>
> [<type>](. it creates files with a .jpg ending if the
> type is >0. But in reality it still is a TIFF. no matter
> what value you write.
> 
> 3. pix_write creates files with an acending number 0...9999
> this conflicts with how other objects like pix_multiimage do
> it (00000...99999)
> 
> just submitted that to the gem bugtracker.
> 
> 
> and the patch:
> put this to / because of the bug in pix_write to make it
> work. put a folder called "frames" beside it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> beware: this patch will also eat up all the memory and will
> crash pd. this isn't pix_writes problem though - i'll try to
> find out why this is now.
> 
> max
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>