[PD] Pd FLOSS Manual Update pt 1
fbar at footils.org
Mon Apr 13 08:48:50 CEST 2009
Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> I'm not comfortable with the right inlet of [symbol] rejecting [pitch(, nor
> with [pitch( working only in the first inlet of pack. And not so comfortable
> really with [list one two(--[route one] behaving differently than [list 1
> 2(--[route 1].
> Maybe they're nothing special to you because you already understand and are
> comfortable with all the special cases. But I can imagine a beginner getting
> really confused over [route symbol] not stripping the selector off of [symbol
How many of your patches actually use [route symbol]?
(In general to strip off selectors, [list trim] should be used nowadays.)
> It's confusing and inconsistent, and symbols/lists in Pd are limited
> enough that a comprehensive list of behaviors for the basic symbol-handling
> objects is doable. (see below)
Object behaviour is vocabulary - you have to memorize it for each object
separately just like irregular verbs. The message system with selector and all
that is grammar that describes the general rules to form sentences. The message
system itself is easy - it almost fits into this: "a message is a selector +
data". Memorizing all objects of course is hard(er), and indeed there are some
inconsistencies in objects like [route] stripping off list-, but not
But all these things are behaviours of single objects and thus vocabulary. You
could write a [route] which would strip off the symbol-selector of "symbol
pitch" or which would not strip off any list-selectors. Or build a [symbol]
that does accept non-symbol-messages or even floats into its right inlet. Maybe
someone already did it as an external.
But they would be different objects - and would still work with the same
message system grammar of Pd.
More information about the Pd-list