[PD] abstraction creation audio engine start
tutifornari at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 16:33:48 CEST 2009
that scheme will work only to turn on the newly created (and muted)
abstractions. however, still there will be a "click" and/or audio
interruption as you do the "pd dsp 0; pd dsp 1;" trick. I seek a
smooth solution (i.e. as the abstractions are created, their sounds
come to life, ... no clicks, no hiccups).
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 00:23 +0900, hard off wrote:
>> what about something like sending a value to the inlet of an audio
>> arithmetic object? would that update the dsptree?
>> i'm wondering why the audio in my abstractions is working, because i
>> don't think i am doing any of those things.
> afaik, it's only the newest dynamically created tilde-abstraction, that
> is _not_ part of the dsp-tree. if you generate 3000 abstractions
> dynamically, you won't notice the one, that is missing.
> i hope, someone with insight into the pd-code can confirm this: i
> experienced, that turning dsp off _before_ dynamically create
> abstractions, and turning dsp on again after it, is much faster. i
> assume (someone please correct me), this is because as long as dsp is
> off, the dsp tree isn't updated at all, even if tilde objects are
> created. however, when it is running, it will get updated on the
> creation of every instance, which makes it so slow. when it's off during
> the creation and turned only after, the dsp-tree will be only update
> this is why all my dynamic patches do a [t b b b] with the following
> - [; pd dsp 0(
> - create all the instances dynamically
> - [; pd dsp 1(
> Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list