[PD] Slow cpu/RJDJ patching approach ...

Max abonnements at revolwear.com
Tue Jun 2 01:25:06 CEST 2009

btw is there a way for the patch to know if it's in -nogui mode?

Am 31.05.2009 um 09:10 schrieb Roman Haefeli:

> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On May 25, 2009, at 9:17 PM, danomatika wrote:
>>> I don't really need an accelerated gui as I like what Pd has now, I
>>> just think these basic elements should not peg the cpu in -nogui
>>> mode.  That way I can work in a nice graphical environment to create
>>> the patches, then run said patches in the minimal environment and
>>> not get penalized for using gui objects/parameters.
> why aren't you putting a:
>     [r NOGUI]
>      |
> [spigot]
> in front of every gui object?
> don't get me wrong, i am not saying, that i wouldn't like to see that
> automatically happen in pd, when used in -nogui mode, but until this  
> is
> implemented, this might be an approach for a workaround.
> roman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090602/1192ffa3/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list