[PD] [PD-announce] Pd-extended 0.41.4 released!
Dafydd Hughes
dafydd61 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 8 14:10:02 CEST 2009
I know that once I worked out my own issues, the extended 0.41.4 rc
worked fine on my eeepc 701.
But now I want to try a build, just to see what happens. Do you think
I should completely purge the package I have on right now?
cheers
dafydd
On 8-Jun-09, at 3:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Have you tried? I think you'd need about 200-300 megs max, the -
>> dev packages are not large. The source tarball is 30 megs. That
>> thing has 4 gigs, right?
> it has a 4gig sdd card. this does not necessarily mean that there
> are 4gb available on josephs machine :-)
>
>
> anyhow, what i would be interested in: i thought that NBR is just a
> slightly modified flavour of an ordinary ubuntu release, with better
> support for various netbook hardware and slightly modified
> appearance in order to make better use of the limited screen size.
>
> since nobody ever cared to create a flavour of Pd that uses space
> more efficiently (and that without breaking visual compatibility to
> PdX), i don't see anything that would make a NBR deb different from
> an ordinary ubuntu deb.
>
> so why can't you just install jaunty package?
> (after a bit of googling i noticed that they use lpia as
> "architecture", which mainly differs in optimization flags for the
> compiles; since (i guess that) nobody has cared yet to find "lpia
> optimized" flags for PdX, the resulting binaries will really be the
> same)
> there are tools for converting ordinary i386 debs to lpia, like the
> one here: http://ppa.launchpad.net/feranick/ppa/ubuntu/pool/main/d/deb2lpia/
>
>
> fgamsdr
> IOhannes
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list