[PD] GEM objects position

mami music mami.music at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 00:10:06 CEST 2009


Cyrille
>gem object position is computed thanks to mathematics, i don't understand
why it could be untraceable.
>yes, gemlist info.

Yes youre right. I just need a [gemlist_info]
Thanks for your help

Daniel


2009/6/11 cyrille henry <cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr>

>
>
> mami music a écrit :
>
>> Hello
>> If i wanted to figure out an object´s possition in GEM i could always
>> calculate ( by using geometry, math and the transformations applied to the
>> object) the possition of an object, if all the transformations were
>> non-random (dont knkow that word in english but in spanish there is
>> certainly one). But if I apply a random possition operation many times to
>> the object, then it seems that is untraceable using Math.
>>
> hum.
> gem object position is computed thanks to mathematics, i don't understand
> why it could be untraceable.
>
>
>
>> Is there an object that can tell us the possition of a certain 3d or 2d
>> object in GEM, without having to calculate it?
>>
> yes, gemlist info.
> see help file.
>
> Cyrille
>
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090611/5b40c59a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list