[PD] Help Docs: element vs. item
matju at artengine.ca
Mon Aug 10 06:05:36 CEST 2009
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> --- On Sun, 8/9/09, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
>> Check the Pd Definitions wiki on http://puredata.info/dev for some discussion on this
>> stuff. And please add anything there that you think
>> should be there.
> On the Pd Definitions wiki, they are referred to as elements, and I've
> already changed the reference patches to reflect this.
I wouldn't quite advocate using the PdDefinitions as they are now. Much of
the way people talk about pd is ambiguous, and that includes Miller too.
The Pd Manual itself has a fair amount of vague talk, but then, the
PdDefinitions page handpicks quotes in it without regard to whether "the
definition of float" is about float-values, float-atoms,
floatatom-objects, the floatatom class, the strings recognised as floats,
or the strings that floats are outputted as; and likewise for several
other definitions lifted from the manual.
"atoms are either numbers or symbols" -> that's only when you look at what
you can write in a messagebox that can end up as-is in a message. This
ignore comma atoms, semicolon atoms, dollar atoms ($1), dollsym atoms
($1-blah), and pointer atoms (which can't be produced by the parser).
"There are two atom boxes, floatatom and symbolatom" -> this is irrelevant
to the definition of an atom, of a float, or of a symbol, in that you
could make patches without ever using any atomboxes and you could
still see all the characteristics of float values and symbol values
"Anything that is not a valid number is considered a symbol." -> this is
only in the context of parsing, and only once the commas and semicolons
are dealt with.
"The selector is a symbol, which appears in the patch as a non-numeric
string with no white space, semicolons, or commas." -> the manual doesn't
take into account any weird thing you can do in Pd, even with pure pd, and
even without hand-editing any .pd files. E.g. this patch:
#N canvas 0 0 450 300 10;
#X obj 12 31 makefilename %d;
#X msg 12 13 123;
#X msg 12 67;
#X msg 12 49 set \$1 \, bang;
#X obj 12 85 f;
#X connect 0 0 3 0;
#X connect 1 0 0 0;
#X connect 2 0 4 0;
#X connect 3 0 2 0;
ends up saying:
no method for '123'
but "no method for" errors always state the selector, and here, 123 is a
selector, which is a symbol, but is printed in a way that makes it look
like a float.
> Because of the way they are laid out, I don't think there is any
> ambiguity between first element and selector in the help patches (I
> don't think "selector" is used in any of them, but I'll check and make
Selector ought to be used to talk about all those so-called
"meta-messages", not only because the Pd Manual does, but also because the
manuals of several other programming languages call that same thing by the
same name. It's not like selectors are a weird thing from outerspace that
got stuck into Pd for no reason (even though some facts about Pd's
selectors are a bit weird).
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
More information about the Pd-list