[PD] sustain pedal abstraction

[Jonathan Wilkes]

Have you tried using the [bag] object?

-Jonathan

--- On Thu, 8/13/09, Amos Robinson <amos.robinson at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Amos Robinson <amos.robinson at gmail.com>
> Subject: [PD] sustain pedal abstraction
> To: "pd list" <pd-list at iem.at>
> Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 3:06 PM
> Hi guys,
> 
> Just in case you're interested, I wanted to use my sustain
> pedal in
> Pd, so wrote these abstractions:
> sustain, with three inputs: note, velocity, pedal (nonzero
> for
> sustain, zero for no effect)
> 
> dam, with two inputs: a list value, and flow bool.
> 
> I guess when flow is 0 it's like a [pipe 1e999], and flow
> set to 1 it
> flushes. I thought of doing it that way but felt that using
> lists
> would be better. I think after actually implementing it
> though I've
> changed my mind.
> 
> Question: is there a simpler way than these that I'm
> missing?
> 
> Thanks,
> Amos Robinson
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>