[PD] Hot inlet position
Miller Puckette
mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Thu Aug 20 17:27:34 CEST 2009
indeed, that's why I wrote it -- Max and Pd are based on many design
principles that are far from universally shared; by making them explicit
I might help some readers think about their own different ones -- mine
shouldn't be more than a reference point.
cheers
Miller
>
> I hope as many people who read that paper can read it critically. Several
> of the ideas contained therein are detrimental and harmful to the
> perception and evolution of Pd/Max. Things like: Max isn't a "programming
> environment", and even less a "real-world programming environment";
> features are left out because Max users aren't professional programmers;
> Max is "lacking any notion of linear control-flow" (whatever that
> means???); Max doesn't have scoping because musicians don't need it; the
> idea that object-oriented programming is all about inheritance; elegance
> in code has nothing to do with making creative music; the computer-science
> crowd preaches that reuse of code is essential to communicating knowledge;
> Max somehow opposed itself to computer science; "The computer should
> ideally feel in the musician's hands like a musical instrument, needing
> only to be tuned up and then played" (!!!); etc... well I should put a
> (!!!) after each of those phrases. If you need any justification from me
> for any item(s) on this list I will provide it (if I did it all upfront,
> it could be long like a paper).
>
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801, Montr?al, Qu?bec
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list