[PD] .deb depends WAS: pd-flite text-to-speech offline ?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Sat Aug 22 20:51:22 CEST 2009
On Aug 22, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>> I guess, then this "audio" meta package should depend on "pd", not
>>> on
>>> "puredata", which could then be fullfilled with either "puredata" or
>>> "pd-extended" (but currently not both ...)
>>
>>
>> What's the 'audio' meta package? In general, packages should
>> depend on
>> 'pd' unless they really need a specific version (vanilla, extended,
>> DD,
>> etc.).
>
> I was referring to Tim's offlist mail that you quoted, and I got the
> name
> wrong: It's called "ubuntustudio-audio". Tim's error was:
>
> ubuntustudio-audio depends on puredata
>
> so he couldn't install pd-extended, which "only" provides "pd". I
> assume that
> "ubuntustudio-audio" is a meta-package which in itself is empty, but
> it depends
> on a lot of useful audio packages, so they can be install in one
> command. If
> "upbuntustudio-audio" would depend on pd, not on puredata, than pd-
> extended and
> puredata both could provide "pd" and make ubuntustudio-audio as
> happy as a dog
> with two tails. :)
Couldn't have said it better myself. As a workaround, you can install
ubuntustudio-audio, then it'll install everything. Then you can "apt-
get remove ubuntustudio-audio puredata", then apt-get install pd-
extended" or however.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All information should be free. - the hacker ethic
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list