[PD] implications of pd~ for 'poly' objects
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Tue Sep 8 19:29:23 CEST 2009
It would definitely be possible to write a pdpoly~ but usually it
would be easier to manually manage 2-4 instances. Few people have
more than 4 cores. I see those poly objects as useful for 10+ and
make managing 100s or 1000s possible.
.hc
On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Phil Stone wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have skimmed Miller's paper from Pd-con about [pd~], and it looks
> like it has potential for taking advantage of multiple-core CPUs. I
> need to read it in a little more detail to digest it fully, but I'm
> wondering (and this is directed mostly at Frank B.): could
> [polypoly] and/or [nqpoly] use [pd~] for each voice/replicated-patch
> instance?
>
>
> Phil Stone
> www.pkstonemusic.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. -
David Zicarelli
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list