[PD] Feedback discussion

Derek Holzer derek at umatic.nl
Wed Sep 16 03:41:20 CEST 2009

I can't really say from a supra-atomic standpoint I could agree with 
you, but I'd settle for the speed of light, or even the remotely distant 
figure of the response time of an op-amp. Which is quite a bit faster 
than your average blocksize or even a single discrete sample--assuming 
that a complex digital system like Pd could react effectively at 
single-sample speed.

Really though, must everything really be so complicated Mathieu? Not 
everything can be so easily described with mathematics. I also like to 
sip single malt whiskey during the last evening hours of a summer headed 
towards autumn...

Sorry to stir up the digital goblins, folks. I merely wanted to share my 
(unsatisfactory) experiences with feedback scenarios in Pd. Your Mileage 
May Vary.


Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> Instantaneousness is a myth. It does not exist in nature. 

::: derek holzer ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista ::: 
http://www.vimeo.com/macumbista :::
---Oblique Strategy # 148:
"State the problem in words as clearly as possible"

More information about the Pd-list mailing list