[PD] Getting the best out of the rewrite (was: Re: pow~, etc. in Pd-extended 0.42.5)
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Sat Nov 14 18:32:58 CET 2009
On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:04 PM, András Murányi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
> <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
>
> I think its good to get to a point where we don't have to worry much
> about backwards compatibility. IMHO, the easiest way to do that is
> embed library and other settings in each patch rather than having
> libraries loaded by default.
>
> Sounds good to me.
> If we want to have backwards-compatibility AND to change things in a
> tabula-rasa way, we could establish a new "file type" (perhaps just
> a new filename extension eg.: .pd2) and then .pd files would be
> parsed with the old logic and .pd2 files with the brand new logic.
> Dunno if it actually makes sense, it just came to my mind now.
That could work. That's how Max/MSP handles it. Here's their
extensions in rough order of introduction:
.pat
.mxt
.mxb
.help
.mxo
.maxpat
.maxhelp
That seems excessive to me tho. I think I'm missing some even.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
kill your television
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20091114/b5487327/attachment.htm>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list