[PD] korg nano kontrol vs pure data

[zmoelnig at iem.at]

Quoting "Justin Glenn Smith" <noisesmith at gmail.com>:

>
> [ctlin 1]
>  |
> [$1 50<
>  |
> [line]
>  |
> [mtof]
>  |
> [osc~]

it's interesting how people stick to this approach!
what it will actually produce is a series of inconsistencies (aka  
"clicks"; in our case: steps|
) every 64 samples.
if you are lucky, the inconssistenies will be small enough to notice.
however chances are quite big that you _will_ notice.

if you want to avoid audio clicks, you should create your lines in  
audio domain and not in message domain

[ctlin 1]
|
[pack 0 50]
|
[line~]
|
[mtof~]
|
[osc~]

or, if there was no signal version of [mtof], something like:

[ctlin 1]
|
[pack 0 50]
|
[line]
|
[mtof]
|
[pack 0 10]
|
[line~]
|
[osc~]



mfgadr
IOhannes

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 1718 bytes
Desc: ?ffentlicher PGP-Schl?ssel
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20091117/11aa049a/attachment.key>