[PD] GEM: writing an image different from the one displayed

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Nov 26 17:40:45 CET 2009


Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
> Ok, IOhannes' patch seems to be what I was looking for, however I have
> the following problems:
> 
> - The patch out-of-the-box saves unreadable tiffs just like Jack's

which OS?

> version: I guess this is a bug in [pix_writer] (and [pix_write])??


might be a bug in the backend that both [pix_writer] and [pix_write] use.

> - By sending it a [file something 95( to pix_writer in order to have
> jpegs saved instead of tiffs, which DOES work with [pix_write], pd
> crashes!!!!!
> - There's no help file for [pix_writer] where I would check whether the
> message syntax for setting the file tipe is different.....

it's really the same object as [pix_write], just without the snap-code.

> Seems like I'm pretty near to the solution, can you help me with the
> last step?


fmt
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20091126/393166eb/attachment.bin>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list