[PD] debugging Graph-On-Parent

[Jonathan Wilkes]

There are some in the bug tracker (if you haven't found them already): 
ID#s 2766622, 2621932, 2598132 come to mind, and there are probably a 
few others still open as well.

I don't have any new ones to add, but I did add a feature 
request: ID# 2904773.  Presently, when you learn to make abstractions you 
have to memorize the font-height of the name of your abstraction 
(and guess its width) to avoid placing objects in the GOP window on top 
of the abstraction name (same for subpatches).  If pd just printed the 
name within the red bounding box, it would make things much easier.

Of course, it shouldn't be printed in the bounding box when you check the 
box to "hide object name and arguments."

-Jonathan



--- On Fri, 11/27/09, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:

> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
> Subject: [PD] debugging Graph-On-Parent
> To: "Pd List" <pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at>
> Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 1:01 AM
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> Since talking with Ico, Luke, Ed, and others it seems to me
> that fully debugging the GOP GUI stuff should be a big
> priority for the 0.42.5 release of Pd-extended.  This
> would also fit in well with the wrapping up of
> pd-gui-rewrite.
> 
> So for all you deep into GUIs with Pd, please report bugs
> and make example patches so we can get to the bottom of
> this.  Ico's is a good example:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .hc
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else
> is publicity.          - Bill
> Moyers
> 
> 
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>