[PD] still confused about pix_snap

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Nov 27 22:18:06 CET 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have the impression that GEM documentation is very poor. Please prove
> I'm wrong, that would make me very happy.

i would be more happy if you could provide better documentation.

fgamsr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAksQQg4ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTVqQCfQsy+yEJXxSz3+wmqxN1i4iId
jVUAnjQH3H1tXZCBvRzNCAdJoqkkGCbA
=B/H2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Pd-list mailing list