[PD] still confused about pix_snap
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Nov 27 22:18:06 CET 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the impression that GEM documentation is very poor. Please prove
> I'm wrong, that would make me very happy.
i would be more happy if you could provide better documentation.
fgamsr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksQQg4ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTVqQCfQsy+yEJXxSz3+wmqxN1i4iId
jVUAnjQH3H1tXZCBvRzNCAdJoqkkGCbA
=B/H2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list