[PD] documenting new vanilla objects WAS: bug 2621932 appeared in version 0.42

marius schebella marius.schebella at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 01:33:23 CET 2009


it would be nice to have *all* vanilla objects documented on one page. I 
am thinking of putting all objects right at the front page of 
wiki.puredata.info. very much the way processing does it.
http://processing.org/reference/
marius.

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 9:21 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
>>> This is the same version in which a feature was introduced such that
>>> when you create a new object with another one selected, a connection
>>> between the two is automatically created (btw am I the only one who
>>> thinks that feature is absolutely annoying?).
>>> Dunnow if it is a coincidence or if there may be a relation...
>>>
>> it might also be related to the introduction of the (somewhat annoying)
>> [wrap] object. might be a coincidence though...:-)
> 
> It would be good to have those additions documented.  I started with 
> what I know:
> 
> http://wiki.puredata.info/en/History_of_new_objects_in_Pd-vanilla
> 
> Perhaps the page could be called just "new objects in Pd-vanilla".  
> There could also be "New objects in Gem", etc.
> 
> .hc
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> 
> News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is 
> publicity.          - Bill Moyers
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 





More information about the Pd-list mailing list