[PD] efficiency savings?

[Andy Farnell]

Breaking things up into abstractions lets
you do 'unit tests' on subsystems to check
their performance separately from the rest
of the the patch. 

On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Oded Ben-Tal <oded at ccrma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:

> I started putting together elements of a patch that I worked on separately 
> and I'm getting sound droopouts. It seems I'm simply asking Pd to do too 
> much for real-time processing. I started making the code more efficient by 
> removing number and gui objects that I used for debugging and used switch~ 
> to shut off audio processing in windows when not used. Any other general
> suggestions? Is there a method of finding out which parts of the patch are 
> most demanding?
> 
> thanks
> Oded
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my 3 (http://three.co.uk) mobile broadband
   Third world internet for a first world economy.
* 20 bytes/second * 99% packet loss  * 60 second latency
 All for only £20/month (Odious and predatory terms apply)