[PD] [instance] and dynamic object creation

[Marco Donnarumma]

thanks IOhannes, Frank!
Both your approaches seem to be solving my problem so far.
And mixing the 2 techniques makes possible some interesting operations with
abstractions and unique id.
I'm trying to build kind of automated/dynamic patcher to create chains of
gop abstractions fast and easy.
I'll keep you updated...

cheers

M


On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:18 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> Marco Donnarumma wrote:
> >> If you want a loadbang, you can send a message "loadbang" to
> "pd-mypatch",
> >> i.e.:
> >>
> >> [;
> >> pd-mypatch.pd obj 10 10 myobject;
> >> pd-mypatch.pd loadbang(
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> --
> >> Frank
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Frank, I was already trying to send a loadbang, but the first
> > [instance] has the right id (1), then the following [instance] has id =
> 3,
> > the next 6 and so on. Besides also other instances of [instance] with
> > different arguments are affected the same way while sending a loadbang to
> > the parent patch.
> > You can test this in the example patch I sent yesterday.
> > Probably I'm missing something, but I'm struggling to make it work
> without
> > good results.
>
> if you want to send a single bang to a single object the arguments of
> which you can control (and know) you can do:
>
> [; pd-mypatch.pd obj 10 10 myobject <myuniqid>;
> <myuniqid>_loadbang bang; (
>
> and them make sure you have a [r $1_loadbang] in your [instance]
>
> madfas
> IOhannes
>



-- 
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100202/257983e4/attachment.htm>