[PD] peak amplitude in pd vanilla (was: [env~ ] vs [vsnapshot~ ]: which one is more cpu consuming?)

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2010-02-09 11:32, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> i haven't tested it, but you might be way more efficient when using
> [tabsend~] to write to an array and analyse it as frank suggested.


as a matter of fact both perform crap (and while [env~] does something
totally different (which requires more computation) it is way faster)

probably i did something wrong.

fgamsdr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: peak.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 1829 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100209/7c2e2cb1/attachment.zip>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100209/7c2e2cb1/attachment.bin>