[PD] poly second inlet

Matteo Sisti Sette matteosistisette at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 01:26:33 CET 2010

Jonathan Wilkes escribió:
> Maybe there should be a third inlet for voice stealing.

Should one need that, it wouldn't be difficult to create an abstraction 
to implement that by encapsulating two [poly]s, one with voice stealing 
and the other without it, switching between them (*).

On the other hand an inlet for dynamically changing the number of voices 
would probably be more useful (and whatever the use one may find for it, 
it couldn't be done on top of the static poly)

(*) ohhh, no, well, it _would_ be difficult if you don't assume that 
there are no pending note_off's when the voice-stealing-activation is 
changed; it would probably be almost as difficult as re-implementing 
[poly] from scratch in Pd, if not more...

Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistisette at gmail.com

More information about the Pd-list mailing list