[PD] poly second inlet
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistisette at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 01:26:33 CET 2010
Jonathan Wilkes escribió:
>
> Maybe there should be a third inlet for voice stealing.
>
Should one need that, it wouldn't be difficult to create an abstraction
to implement that by encapsulating two [poly]s, one with voice stealing
and the other without it, switching between them (*).
On the other hand an inlet for dynamically changing the number of voices
would probably be more useful (and whatever the use one may find for it,
it couldn't be done on top of the static poly)
(*) ohhh, no, well, it _would_ be difficult if you don't assume that
there are no pending note_off's when the voice-stealing-activation is
changed; it would probably be almost as difficult as re-implementing
[poly] from scratch in Pd, if not more...
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistisette at gmail.com
http://www.matteosistisette.com
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list