[PD] To pack or not to be packed that is the question ! (?)
meino.cramer at gmx.de
meino.cramer at gmx.de
Wed Mar 3 19:43:51 CET 2010
Hi,
I made a [pack t b f f f f f f f f f f ]
And connect ten vertical sliders to inlet 2-10 (1-based).
Then I connected the outlet of the [pack] to
a message box with the following contents:
[wave1 sinesum $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10]
I added a tabread4-mimic and could display the wave in an array
visually.
So nice so mysterious ( at least for me ;) )
Slider 1 to slider 8 are working as exspected, moving slider
nine and ten results in nothing but the pure sound of silence
(visually spoken...).
For what I read about [pack] the inlets sequence follows
the arguments or in my case inlet #2 up to #10 are exspecting
float arguments, which are given by the vsliders.
A [BANG] at inlet #2 send a bang into the pack.
But the reason, why slider #9 and slider #10 are on holidays
is not very obvious to me.
The aim of all this should be a wave, which reacts on changes of each
of the sliders instantly without sending an extra bang.
And I want to have all slider (better: much more than ten) working.
And if there is a way to normalize the result instantly I would
one step nearer to eternity ;))))
I know, that there are obviously far better and total different ways
to accomplish what I want to acchieve, but for the first I only
want to understand, why this beast is only running on eight instead
of ten legs (my be a spider therefore... ;)
Thanks a lot for any help in advance!
Best regards
mcc
--
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list