[PD] pix_snap + pix_record = problem
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistisette at gmail.com
Sun Mar 21 17:57:00 CET 2010
Thank you Peter and der.brandt for the patches.
Your test patches work (and so do some variations of them that make them
essentially similar to what I'm trying to do): I'm trying to find out
what's different in my patch; at the moment I can't find any significant
difference.... I'll let you know
It would help (maybe) to know what the- those error messages mean...
thanks
m.
news at petervenus.de escribió:
> Hello
> I am working with [pix_snap] and its running quite good.
> In the attachment you will find a test-patch i build out of help-files.
> While playing around with [pix_snap]i noticed, that its quite important,
> to have different gemheads for the parts where you do something
> to the source-signal and the part of the patch where you record the video.
> like having [gemhead 5] for the first, and [gemhead 55] for the snapping part.
> that way the first part gets handled before the image is snapped.
> hope that helps.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Matteo Sisti Sette
> Gesendet: 21.03.2010 13:23:16
> An: Jaime Oliver
> Betreff: Re: [PD] pix_snap + pix_record = problem
>
> Jaime Oliver escribió:
>> I had a similar error in osx10.6.
>
> Did you find a workaround? Could you ever record a sequence of snapped
> pixes into a video file?
>
> thanks
> m.
>
>
>
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistisette at gmail.com
http://www.matteosistisette.com
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list