[PD] "dummy" pix_crop question
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Mar 26 19:11:22 CET 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When the pix_crop is set to 0,0 offset and a size equal to the input
> image size, that is it is identical to no crop at all, will it consume
> the same amount of CPU as a nontrivial crop?
most likely (but i don't know; every now and then there are
optimizations...)
i'd say: try it out :-)
"nontrivial" should consume more processing power (and bus transfer)
than the optimized "trivial" case.
> And by the way, I suppose that (at least when the crop is actually
> nontrivial) when the input image changes, performing the crop means
> actually copying all the pixels within the cropped region, doesn't it?
>
yes.
so you can perform weird stuff inline on the cropped image without
affecting the original image.
fg,asr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkus+MoACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQUZwCcC+l3rV6ANQE7WblzxpOOMhWr
D/4AoMsXYPQwV73K97E4bg6D2AH7m3lZ
=YODa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list