[PD] tabread4~ "broken" interpolation algorithm - was Re: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
cyrille henry
ch at chnry.net
Mon Mar 29 17:52:55 CEST 2010
Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit :
> By the way tabread4c~ is not in Pd Extended, is it?
no.
it is there :
http://www.chnry.net/ch/?083-Nusmuk-audio
c
>
> Roman Haefeli escribió:
>> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:49 +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
>>
>>> Claude wrote:
>>> > If you use [tabread4] to interpolate graphical
>>> > parameters for animations, the discontinuities in the derivatives are
>>> > really obvious.
>>> [....]
>>> > But IMHO if you're doing piecewise cubic interpolation, it's a bit
>>> > of a nonsense to have a cubic that goes through all 4 points when
>>> > it's only being used between the inner-most 2 points
>>>
>>> Well using 4 points to interpolate the curve that goes between the
>>> two inner points should guarantee the absence of discontinuities in
>>> the first (and second?) derivative; that should be the purpose. Now
>>> if there actually are discontinuities then there must be some trivial
>>> error in the equation, no????
>>>
>>> Or am I missing something???
>>
>> Check this thread:
>> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-06/062878.html
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list