[PD] pd~ and DIO errors
timvets at gmail.com
Sat Apr 3 13:02:23 CEST 2010
2010/4/3 tim vets <timvets at gmail.com>
> Hi Patrick,
> 2010/4/3 patrick <puredata at 11h11.com>
> hi tim,
>> just to be sure, do you use the -rt flag when starting pd? also, try to
>> run everything (jack, pd) in root (just to see if the glitches is the cause
>> of a limitation).
> Yes, I start pd with "pd -rt -jack"
> I tried your suggestion, running pd as root, but got no better results.
> Some parts in the patch contain several [sigmund~] and [bonk~] objects,
> which seem quite heavy, so I'd like to put those in a separate pd process,
> to make use of the other processors on the machine...
> I even get DIO errors when I load my abstraction in a pd~ object and don't
> switch~ it on, whereas when loading it as a regular abstraction, switch~-ing
> it off stops the DIO errors.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list