[PD] pd and multi-core processors
tim vets
timvets at gmail.com
Mon Apr 5 16:00:24 CEST 2010
>
> tim vets a écrit :
>
> has anyone been using pd~ successfully ?
>>
> yes
>
> I am trying it out, but i get very poor results.
>> It seems like a patch loaded with pd~ is a lot heavier than the same
>> loaded as a regular abstraction (DIO errors, see also my message "pd~ and
>> DIO errors").
>> I assumed it would run on another processor core...but does it?
>>
> if your OS can deal with multiple CPU, then it should run the pd and pd~
> process on 2 different core.
>
>
Ok, I have no idea id ubuntu-studio Hardy supports it...
>
> Is there a way to check this?
>>
> depend on your OS.
>
>
ubuntu
gr,
Tim
> cyrille
>
> thanks!
>>
>>
>> 2010/4/5 Jaime Oliver <jaime.oliver2 at gmail.com <mailto:
>> jaime.oliver2 at gmail.com>>
>>
>>
>> hey vedran,
>> pd~ is a way of opening another instance of pd from within a patch.
>>
>> ideally you want gem and sound on separate instances (connected via
>> udp, pd~ or some other way). each of these processes will use one
>> processor.
>>
>> nicely enough, pd's graphical interface and the actual process, are
>> separate threads, so you (or more precisely your OS) might have them
>> in separate processors if needed.
>>
>> for sound, you can create objects in faust and make multithreaded
>> audio externals.
>>
>> other than that, the processes in a patch are single threaded.
>>
>> J
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:59 AM, vedran <vedran.kolac at gmail.com
>> <mailto:vedran.kolac at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> can someone tell me if one instance of pd (with gem) can use
>> more than one core on multi-core processor?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .....................................................
>> vedran kolac
>> .....................................................
>> gTalk - vedran.kolac at gmail.com <mailto:vedran.kolac at gmail.com>
>>
>> .....................................................
>> skype - vedrankolac
>> .....................................................
>> +385 (0) 91 567 07 17
>> .....................................................
>> http://www.onoxo.net
>> http://www.projectmoe.net
>> .....................................................
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at iem.at> mailing list
>>
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Jaime E Oliver LR
>>
>> www.jaimeoliver.pe <http://www.jaimeoliver.pe>
>>
>>
>> 858 750 0924 (cel)
>> 858 202 1522 (home)
>> 9168 Regents Rd. Apt. G
>> La Jolla, CA 92037
>> USA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at iem.at> mailing list
>>
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100405/7f0c785b/attachment.htm>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list