[PD] cheaper bonk~ replacement ?

[William Brent]

Hi Tim,

If you can afford to lose some time resolution, you could change
bonk~'s -hop argument to match the window size.  I think it defaults
to a hop that's half the window size.  That should be half as many
FFTs.

Is there any chance [env~] and a threshhold would be good enough in
your situation?  It's a lot cheaper, but as you probably know, much
more prone to false attack reports.

Hope that helps,
William



On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM, tim vets <timvets at gmail.com> wrote:
> hello,
> I'm trying to optimize a patch to run it at the lowest possible latency.
> There is a subpatch with 6 bonk~ objects in it.
> This seems to be quite heavy on the cpu.
> As soon as I switch it on i get crackles.
> Is there a cheaper alternative to track attacks ?
> gr,
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>



-- 
William Brent
www.williambrent.com

“Great minds flock together”
Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century

www.conflations.com