[PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?

colet.patrice at free.fr colet.patrice at free.fr
Fri Apr 16 19:24:59 CEST 2010

uh I missed roman inputs, fortunately there are the archives

Are you implying there was no dance music since the 80's? How bad will
actual 'best technologies' will be in a few years? Is that a discussion
about  certain aesthethics you're looking for or about technical

I took dance as an example of musics that needs to answer a number of sound characteristics
 where technical possibilities are seriously implied in aestethics.
 Not to say that an instrument would sound better if there is a background image or such,
 but the way we are accessing data and modulate them has a severe influence on inspiration.

 At the end the best compromise I've found is like obiwannabe's work, where the patch is the piece.

----- Mail Original -----
De: "Mathieu Bouchard" <matju at artengine.ca>
À: "Roman Haefeli" <reduzierer at yahoo.de>
Cc: "colet patrice" <colet.patrice at free.fr>, "pd-list" <pd-list at iem.at>
Envoyé: Vendredi 16 Avril 2010 18h53:40 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:04 +0200, colet.patrice at free.fr wrote:
>> show me a patch that correctly mix soundfiles.
> That interests me. Can you elaborate a bit more what you mean by
> "mixing"?

Interesting, I was more concerned by the use of the word « correctly ».

For a even a simple cross-fade, any way of smoothing the output of a 
slider is a potential matter of personal preference, and whichever way you 
pick has eventual slightly different consequences on the result.

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801

More information about the Pd-list mailing list