[PD] keycode 92: dropped
porres at gmail.com
Sat Apr 17 08:27:05 CEST 2010
so, is it a random bug? I thought it was on purpose... because of the no
"$0" on messages philosophy...
more on that, if you type $0 in a sumbol box, the backlash appears there...
if the message is sent through this symbol box, the $0 can actually function
as it should on messages...
2010/4/17 Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>
> I've been complaining that we should be able to use "$0" in messages for
>> the sake of simplicity. Apparently you can if you use "\" before it...
>> BUT... Pd does not allow you to write it... as if it REALLY did not want you
>> to do it...
> there are many things wrong with the backslash. if i put 92 through
> [makefilename %c] it makes two backslashes. if I use it as a $1 inside of a
> symbol it becomes four backslashes. if I try to print it, it becomes 8
> backslashes (unless GridFlow is loaded, because it installs its own
> Those hacks probably all come from trying to fix a backslash bug by brute
> force. By fixing the bug in three places, you cancel one of the original
> bugs by three new bugs opposite to the original one, so, whether that
> original bug shows up, you can get up to three new bugs stacked on each
> other, and then, most of the original bugs are still there (iemgui labels
> still can't take backslashes, etc).
> That's just the backslashes... Keycode 123 is actually much more dangerous.
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list