[PD] bug in maxlib/scale

[João Pais]

is the formula somewhere? I found a parcial one by frank, but didn't  
really work. and now I'm too busy to be chasing this.

> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:12 +0300, João Pais wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I found a bug in maxlib/scale. Unless the order of the  
>> parameters
>> is aligned - smaller value as smaller input/output and bigger value for
>> input/output -, the external doesn't work properly. Is this normal or
>> desired? I always thought that the parameter order would be
>> interchangeable without problems.
>>
>> Here's a patch to illustrate it:
>
> Indeed, very wrong.
>
> Unfortunately, from what I know maxlib is not maintained anymore by its
> original author (probably it can be considered 'community-maintained').
> And since this can be nicely written as an abstraction, I'd say  that
> the buggy external version should be avoided.
>
> Roman
>
>
>


-- 
Friedenstr. 58
10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162 6843570
Studio +49 30 69509190
jmmmpais at googlemail.com | skype: jmmmpjmmmp