[PD] pix_motion_sector

[William Brent]

No, no reason other than that's what I had on my machine when I
compiled it :)  I should update to 0.92.3 and put up the new version.
I'd also like to figure out how to compile this for Linux/Windows.
Before Hans bothered to make a makefile, I was just throwing my source
into GEM's pixes directory and recompiling GEM as a whole so it would
be embedded in the main GEM binary.  I'll see if I can change the
makefile and get it going on my Linux machine later today.  If you
don't mind, I may have a couple questions for you off-list if I run
into any trouble.



On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> On 2010-05-19 22:53, William Brent wrote:
>> site?  That one was built using GEM 0.92.2.  If you haven't tried
>
> is there any reason to use gem-0.92.2?
> minor releases only fix bugs, so 0.92.3 is (expteced to be) more stable
> than 0.92.2.
> to be precise, 0.92.3 fixed a memleak in the tracking code
> (pix_multiblob though) and a crasher bug.
>
> ghmasdr
> IOhannes
>
>



-- 
William Brent
www.williambrent.com

“Great minds flock together”
Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century

www.conflations.com