[PD] no pdsend on pdextended?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Works for me, for this release the conflict doesn't make sense.  Its something to reconsider once pd-extended is split into separate debiaqn packages.

.hc

"IOhannes m zmoelnig" <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

>On 2010-05-19 22:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> anyhow: now that pd-extended installs everything into
>>> /usr/lib/pd-extended/extra/
>>> i don't see any reason why it still conflicts with: pd-externals, gem,
>>> pd-pdp, pd-zexy
>> 
>> Well, the plan going forward is to split pd-extended into individual
>> packages, and we'll have to work out the whole /usr/lib/pdextended vs.
>> /usr/lib/pd vs. /usr/lib/puredata question.  So for now I think it makes
>> sense.  Maybe not tho...
>
>
>sure.
>but for now pd-extended installs Gem.pd_linux into
>/usr/lib/pd-extended/extra/Gem/ whereas pd-gem installs into
>/usr/lib/pd/extra/Gem/
>
>the puredata package will never load Gem from the pd-extended libs
>(unless explicitely told so), whereas (current) pd-extended will never
>load Gem from the pd-gem (unless explicitely told so)
>
>they simply do not conflict at all (nor do they "replace" each other)
>instead the conflict creates problems for users like christian, who have
>a hard time installing both puredata and pd-extended.
>
>i will therefore remove the conflict.
>
>
>mfgasdr
>IOhannescd
>

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.