[PD] no pdsend on pdextended?

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Pedro Lopes wrote:
> 
> It doesn't make much sense in my head, if I do not need GEM I shouldn't be
> forced to install it. I can try installing GEM to see if then pd will not
> uninstall pd-extended.

you should exactly _not_ install gem (the "puredata" package "suggests"
to install gem, and most modern package managers will automatically
install all "suggest"ed packages (hence the problem) unless told so
otherwise.
please install "puredata", then manually uninstall "gem", then install
pd-extended.
should work.

> 
> if my opinion can count for anything, it would be nice if we could clear out
> the installation of packages to a more transparent/independent way, as
> talked in this list.

i have removed the conflict with "gem" a few days ago; probably it is
already in the nightly builds. so try a recent autobuild.


fgmasr
IOhannes


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkv6wbYACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTkYQCfbK6z76VinGfccM8qta7XghvP
XN8AnjGgpJht6RGj235V7ZMiHwMLmRaG
=03xA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----