[PD] thoughts on Pd's networking framework

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2010-05-25 16:38, Thomas Grill wrote:
> Hi all,

> If i were dependent on it, i would write a threaded networking
> external to circumvent PD networking functionality and find out
> whether this is the culprit.

that's why there now is "iemnet".
first test showed that it is way faster than mrpeach's objects (back
then when we tested), and both sending and receiving are fully threaded.
(however, we have not deployed it with the CUBEmixer yet)

fgmasdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100525/3dc710a8/attachment.bin>