No subject

Mon Jun 7 12:09:39 CEST 2010

later I can probably find a way to be backwards compatible with it, so there's
no reason not to use it!


On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:11:52AM +0100, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
> hi Thomas and all,
> I have put the poly~ project aside, not even realizing it is eagerly
> awaited.  Several ``balloon probes'' I have been sending to this list
> failed to uncover that...
> After all, it is Miller who has the final say here.  He can do this
> better than me.  He can look into Pd's future.  The poor rabin~ is
> just made to suit my current very simple needs, _and_ in the hope
> it could help (or provoke) designing of the proper thing.
> Same goes for a score follower -- the xeq_follow is a crap, it is not
> a universal tool, but it is just what I need to have now.
> Krzyszt-still-before-coffee-of
> Btw. poly~ does not scale to multi-channel, all its voices are mixed.
> Thomas Grill wrote:
> ...
> > > also i'm missing some abstractions. in supercollider it's no problem to
> > > scale a patch from 1 to 4 to 16 channels. how could i make a patch with
> > > 48 channels, without drawing lots of lines? maybe it's possible and i
> > > just don't know it.
> > 
> > That will be possible once Krzysztof has finished his eagerly awaited poly
> > implementation.
> > See Max/MSP for reference.

More information about the Pd-list mailing list