[PD] Question About Arrays
pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
Mon Jun 7 16:30:05 CEST 2010
>turning that into an external is maybe not efficient - it would better to
add these features to the >already existing array object.
I meant, altering the existing array into a new bounded_array object, or
whatever name suits better. The difference is it would be a compiled object
and not an abstraction.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, João Pais <jmmmpais at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I've written a version of an array with step values and limits, using data
>> structures. I could send it to >the list, but I would need some time to
>> isolate the code from the main patch.
>> That would be interesting João! Another possibility is turning that into a
>> direct external, that does the work internally. (I'm assuming you did an
>> abstraction... "because you said isolate it from the main patch" - if not,
>> even better!)
> turning that into an external is maybe not efficient - it would better to
> add these features to the already existing array object.
> yes, it would be an abstraction. it isn't in my patch, but can easily turn
> into one. I'm very busy now, if I find the time I'll make an abstraction out
> of it.
contacto: jazz at radiozero.pt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list