[PD] 64-bit build (was Re: [PD-announce] Pd-extended 0.42.5 release candidate 1 released!)
Martin Eckart
imartron at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 21:35:53 CEST 2010
So my first attempt compiled okay but without gmerlin support in Gem
which is necessary for my patches at least. I just remembered that I
need the gmerlin packages from Roman's PPA
( https://launchpad.net/~reduzierer/+archive/rdz-pd-extra+deps/ ) for it
to work, so I've installed those and am compiling again. Maybe it is
worth having 2 auto-builds? One normal and a second with gmerlin (and
possibly other configurations) support?
-martin
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:51 -0400, Martin Eckart wrote:
> OK, cool. I'm mostly doing it for interest's sake.
>
> Does Gem compile with gmerlin/avdecoder support by default now or do
> extra packages (libgavl-dev?) need to be installed for that?
>
> -martin
>
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:41 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:33 PM, András Murányi wrote:
> >
> > > 2010/6/9 Martin Eckart <imartron at gmail.com>
> > > I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let
> > > you know how
> > > that goes. Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a
> > > directory
> > > called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your
> > > email
> > > introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't
> > > notice).
> > >
> > > So far so good. Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a
> > > daily?
> > > basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent
> > > package?
> > > Just on my own server (imartron.com)?
> > >
> > > -martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by
> > > tomorrow under this one:
> > > http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess
> > > If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the
> > > same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more
> > > Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for
> > > the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one
> > > autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at
> > > all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)
> >
> >
> > We don't need more than one build per platform posted. Since Andras
> > has been running his machine as a build server for a while, that's the
> > one I'd prefer. Its all setup.
> >
> >
> > Otherwise, if people make builds, they should start by posting them
> > anywhere online. If it becomes a regular thing, then we can talk
> > about how to make the uploads automatic.
> >
> >
> > .hc
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > http://at.or.at/hans/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list