[PD] 64-bit build (was Re: [PD-announce] Pd-extended 0.42.5 release candidate 1 released!)

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Its definitely worthwhile to have more builds.  But in the interest of  
simplicity, the 'official' downloads will be ones that run on only  
'official' packages.  The "Contributed Builds" can be anything.

.hc

On Jun 9, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Martin Eckart wrote:

> So my first attempt compiled okay but without gmerlin support in Gem
> which is necessary for my patches at least.  I just remembered that I
> need the gmerlin packages from Roman's PPA
> ( https://launchpad.net/~reduzierer/+archive/rdz-pd-extra+deps/ )  
> for it
> to work, so I've installed those and am compiling again.  Maybe it is
> worth having 2 auto-builds?  One normal and a second with gmerlin (and
> possibly other configurations) support?
>
> -martin
>
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:51 -0400, Martin Eckart wrote:
>> OK, cool.  I'm mostly doing it for interest's sake.
>>
>> Does Gem compile with gmerlin/avdecoder support by default now or do
>> extra packages (libgavl-dev?) need to be installed for that?
>>
>> -martin
>>
>> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:41 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:33 PM, András Murányi wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2010/6/9 Martin Eckart <imartron at gmail.com>
>>>>        I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let
>>>>        you know how
>>>>        that goes.  Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a
>>>>        directory
>>>>        called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your
>>>>        email
>>>>        introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't
>>>>        notice).
>>>>
>>>>        So far so good.  Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a
>>>>        daily?
>>>>        basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent
>>>>        package?
>>>>        Just on my own server (imartron.com)?
>>>>
>>>>        -martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Martin,
>>>>
>>>> i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by
>>>> tomorrow under this one:
>>>> http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess
>>>> If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the
>>>> same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more
>>>> Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for
>>>> the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one
>>>> autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at
>>>> all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)
>>>
>>>
>>> We don't need more than one build per platform posted.  Since Andras
>>> has been running his machine as a build server for a while, that's  
>>> the
>>> one I'd prefer.  Its all setup.
>>>
>>>
>>> Otherwise, if people make builds, they should start by posting them
>>> anywhere online.  If it becomes a regular thing, then we can talk
>>> about how to make the uploads automatic.
>>>
>>>
>>> .hc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>                                              http://at.or.at/hans/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
>




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             kill your television