[PD] class_sethelpsymbol (was: [folder] external?)
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Sun Jun 27 06:40:58 CEST 2010
On Jun 25, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Bryan Jurish wrote:
>
>> I clearly and distinctly recall that you (Hans) mentioned to me off-
>> list in 2008 that use of class_sethelpsymbol() was deprecated for
>> pd-extended ("it is best not to use class_sethelpsymbol() at
>> all" [for pd-extended]) and recommended that I remove those calls
>> from my code
>
> That's the usual mantra. Some kind of preaching without much
> justification. Thou shalt not use class_sethelpsymbol, thou shalt
> not use aliases, because it's ugly and wrong. it's wrong because
> it's ugly, and it's ugly because it's wrong. It's wrong because if
> you used class_sethelpsymbol, it would be ugly. (see also : begging
> the question !). It sounds like a seminar about young sheep being
> guided towards JAVA (Jesus Gosling was born in
> com.sun.labs.Bethlehem at the beginning of our era...)
>
>> Indeed. The same holds (these days) for 'moocow'. I still feel that
>> this discussion is relevant, though.
>
> I don't think it's Hans' business to impose a helpfile style through
> deprecation of class_sethelpsymbol. Library writers deserve more
> freedom than that... EVEN if they decide to misuse it, then Hans
> should not seek to ban sethelpsymbol for example, and instead should
> go against the content or the filename, such anything that Degoyon
> decides to be teaching us about giraffe(s).
How about you guys all speak for yourselves and let me speak for
myself. This time around, all I said is that there is the only time
to use class_sethelpsymbol() is if the help patch is different than
the classname of the object. Its redudant in that case.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://at.or.at/hans/
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list