[PD] software license for pd general patch?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2010-06-29 14:46, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> 2010/6/29 Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>:
>> In this view, Miller has the biggest balls of dem all. :)
> 
> Is there a legal reason for PD not be GPL? 

is there a need for a legal (as opposed to other) reason? maybe there
are people, who simply find GPL too restrictive (in terms of freedom).

> Maybe it has some code from
> another project?

maybe another project that is fundamentally incompatible with GPL has
some code of Pd in it.

mfgadfrt
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100629/23098783/attachment.bin>