[PD] software license for pd general patch?
jmmmpais at googlemail.com
Wed Jun 30 22:23:11 CEST 2010
I'm not excluding anyone, or criticising "the community" (not a good term,
but I brought it up). If I would be critisicing anyone, it would be me,
for not having the same interests as the majority.
maybe with that I wanted to say is that I wrote this patch to cater for
another community (classical musicians that play complex music), and so I
thought that it wouldn't be that interesting to this one. like as if I
take massage courses it's not going to be an interesting topic in the list
- although in the next floss book sprint I could offer massages, instead
of portuguese desserts.
surely someone could get something interesting out of it, but from the
posts I read everyday, and the people I know, it's not something many
people are going to say "at last someone did this". more people might say
that about the bezier curve data-structure abstraction I'm trying to
finish, but have no time for now.
> There aren't many things you can be sure about what can work in this
> community, apart than the fact that if people shared only the things that
> are sure have a chance of becoming popular upfront, the whole community
> would stop functioning at all and everybody would just leave.
> I always do my things for the 1% or 2% of the community that cares about
> my patches, because if they can care about my patches, they deserve that
> don't count them as being part of the community that doesn't care about
> patches. There are enough people doing the same, that all those
> 1% and 2% add up to a very large proportion of what's being produced in
> the pd community.
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162 6843570
Studio +49 30 69509190
jmmmpais at googlemail.com | skype: jmmmpjmmmp
More information about the Pd-list