[PD] get the position of the mass in the same order than the creation with MSD

[Jack]

Hmm, in fact, this system is as slow as PMPD (even more !) even using
[get massesPos mamasse(.
The problem could come that i have 10000 times : mobile mass <-> link
<-> immovable mass ? Is it preferable to have this system managed by
PMPD instead of MSD ?
++

Jack

 

Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 13:31 +0200, Jack a écrit :
> Super ! It is working fine with [massesPosL(, a [until], a [list split
> 4] and a [unpack f f].
> Thanx a lot !
> ++
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> 
> Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 13:24 +0200, Jack a écrit :
> > Hello Cyrille,
> > 
> > Thanks for your answer.
> > My system has 10000 mobiles masses, 10000 immovables masses and 10000
> > links.
> > I tried with [massesPosL( message. But the problem is i got the position
> > of the immovables masses. Maybe i can start to create the 10000
> > immovables masses, then the 10000 mobiles masses and split the list at
> > 10000 (the list is obtained with [massesPosL().
> > Or i can split 4 elements then split 2 elements.
> > I will try...
> > ++
> > 
> > Jack
> > 
> > 
> > Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 09:46 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : 
> > > did the massesPosL message could help you?
> > > 
> > > otherwise, you have the solution to use frank trick :
> > > use the output of the get message to write in a table, and then read the table...
> > > 
> > > c
> > > 
> > > Le 08/07/2010 02:13, Jack a écrit :
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I have a problem with MSD (exactly [MSD2D]). When i send [bang, get
> > > > massesPos mamasse( to [MSD2D], the output order of the positions of the
> > > > masses is not the same that the one which was given during the creation.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure to be clear, so it is better to see an example ;) (see the
> > > > attach patch) :
> > > >
> > > > If i create 3 masses in this order : [mass mamasse 1 100 0 1(, [mass
> > > > mamasse 1 100 2 3( and [mass mamasse 1 100 4 5(.
> > > > Then if i send [bang, get massesPos mamasse(, i can get from the first
> > > > outlet of [MSD2D] :
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 2 3(
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 0 1(
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 4 5(
> > > > Or
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 4 5(
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 2 3(
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 0 1(
> > > > Or
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > This is not really easy for me because i need to conserve this order :/
> > > > It would be better to always get :
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 0 1(
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 2 3(
> > > > [massesPosId mamasse 4 5(
> > > >
> > > > Is there a solution with MSD ?
> > > > With PMPD and dynamic patching, i have no problem, but it is too slow.
> > > > Number of mass>  10000.
> > > > ++
> > > >
> > > > Jack
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list