[PD] Gem: pix_motionblur interferes with pix_buffer

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Jul 14 19:25:39 CEST 2010


On 2010-07-14 19:21, Max wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> in a Gem patch i use pix_motionblur and pix_buffer and after some time with the pix_motionblur added i can't get rid of it any more. Setting the blur to 0 to the right inlet or switching the motionblur off by sending a 0 to the left inlet doesn't take the blur away any more. only re-loading the videos to the buffer makes the image unblurred again.
> It seems like pix_motionblur alters the images which are stored in the buffer.
> Sorry i can't provide a simple patch demonstrating the problem right now, but maybe even this rudimentary description is enough to give me a clue what the reason for this behavior could be.
> 
yes, Gem does most of it's operations "in-place", thus modifying the
incoming image rather than generating a copy. this is all for cache reasons.
if it's important for you to preserve the original image, use
[pix_separator] to force making a copy before mixing the pixes.

fgmasdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100714/02e492db/attachment.bin>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list